Main menu


Casino Developers Promise Surveillance Drone in Times Square

featured image

Image for the article Casino Developers Want to Fill Times Square with Surveillance Drones

Photograph: thong7824 (Shutterstock)

If you like gambling, flying, spying robots, we have great news for you.

Times Square, the fifth circle of hell and the house of hell the most ridiculous ads in the worldcould be the site of New York’s next casino. Caesars Entertainment has teamed up with developer SL Green Realty Corporation for a casino license and they’re trying to sweeten the pot. drive you crazy If you hate privacy.

According to a document obtained by New York Times:

In letters seeking support for the casino, SL Green and Caesars said gambling proceeds could be used to more than double the number of “public safety officers” in Times Square and deploy surveillance drones.

The letter said a new casino would result in more than 50 new artificial intelligence camera systems “strategically placed in Times Square, each capable of monitoring more than 85,000 people a day.”

A new casino could have a huge economic impact on Times Square and the city in general. Tourists and New Yorkers have been slow to return to the area after the pandemic, thanks in part to the recent panic over rising crime rates. The reality is that crime rates have increased by percentage, but they are still at historic lows. And whatever the facts about the crime, experts who spoke to Gizmodo said one thing was clear: increasing surveillance is a bad solution.

“At a time when our cars, subway rides and buses are watched more than ever before, adding a new fleet of drones and AI cameras will deprive us of the right to walk down the street even without being watched,” said Executive Director Albert Fox Cahn. Surveillance Technology Surveillance Project (STOP). “The system will waste money, be ripe for abuse, and do nothing about the real drivers of crime.”

SL Green spokesman Jack Lynch told Gizmodo that the company is working closely with the community and former New York Police Commissioner Bill Bratton, who reportedly helped develop the plan “to find the best package of solutions to make Times Square safer for everyone.” . Caesars Entertainment did not respond to a request for comment.

let’s take a look truths. There was a huge increase in murders in New York during the pandemic. Some were particularly disturbing, including the mass shooting on the subway last April. But according to Bloomberg Newshomicide rate dropped lower than in decades pandemic and today, The number of murders is almost the same as in 2009. In New York’s dark days of the 1970s and ’80s, the murder rate was five times higher than it is now..

So why do we hear so much about crime in B?ig Ahuman? Because the news exaggerates it. Bloomberg’s analysis shows that the number of media mentions of shootings in New York over the past few years is completely unrelated to the actual number of gunshots. There’s an old saying in journalism, “it bleeds,” and reporters and talking heads clearly take it seriously.

Of course, the public does not research crime statistics, hear the headlines and rightfully go crazy. Right at the hint, political figures jump at the chance to show themselves. tough on crimeand surveillance stands out as a solution. New York Governor Kathy Hochul Announcing that more cameras will be made available on the NYC subway system, said recently “You think Big Brother is watching you on the subway? You’re absolutely right. That’s our intention.

“The worst time to introduce new surveillance tools such as drones that will have profound and lasting effects on privacy and justice is when people are concerned about their safety,” said Evan Selinger, professor at Rochester Institute of Technology. surveillance technology. According to Selinger, we should ask the following question: “Is the proposal a security theater that fosters a false sense of security while building dangerous infrastructure that will likely be abused?

Surveillance is often framed as a trade-off between security and privacy, but It doesn’t even help crime. For example, lately there have been cameras around. April group shoot but neither the cops helped to catch the suspect. He surrendered a day later.

What surveillance does is have a disproportionately negative impact on communities of color and other marginalized groups. The “artificial intelligence” camera systems proposed by casino bosses are likely It’s a fancy way of saying facial recognition. Numerous research projects have developed facial recognition tools. serious biassand darker skinned people, women and young people.

We have already seen the potential of this problem to ruin people’s lives. Facial recognition led several wrongful arrests and even jail time for BLack of man for crimes that have nothing to do with it.

The views of people advocating surveillance drones are “full and veiled with the techno-mistakes of the information age,” said Gary T. Marx, professor emeritus of sociology at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Surveillance cameras always raise a number of troubling issues, including fundamental questions about who will access and how data is stored, the reliability of information, and how effective they are.

Marc Holliday, SL Green’s CEO, told the New York Times that New Yorkers have a responsibility to protect the streets. “It’s up to us to make sure Times Square keeps up with the times and doesn’t go back to what I would call the bad old days of the ’70s or early ’90s,” Holliday said. “We all remember what it was like when it came to crime and overt drug use.” But holiday at the same time advocating a giant new center for drinking and gambling. What if you want a home of evil and evil or you don’t, Mr. Holliday. Choose one.

Increased surveillance not only harms marginalized communities, it also has a chilling effect on freedom of expression. People act differently when they know they’re being watched, and if the plan goes wrong, it could change the tenor of the entire district representing New York to millions of visitors.As much as New Yorkers hate going there.

“I’m worried that if the city makes this high-stakes bet on casino surveillance, it’s going to gamble the future of our public streets,” said Fox Cahn of STOP. “For generations, New Yorkers have used Times Square to protest injustice and march for a better future, but this plan will give us a techno-dystopian nightmare instead.”